Why is the statement about women as best executives considered a Non Sequitur?

The designation of the statement about women as best executives as a Non Sequitur is grounded in its failure to logically connect premises to its conclusion. A Non Sequitur arises when a conclusion is drawn that does not logically follow from the premises or evidence presented. In this case, stating that women are the best executives does not necessarily follow from any argument provided; it lacks a foundation of relevant evidence to substantiate such an assertion.

This phenomenon means the conclusion may appear plausible or appealing but does not hold up upon examination because the reasoning fails to link claims effectively. The lack of a solid connection to the conclusion indicates that the argument does not adhere to logical principles that should guide rational discourse, leading to the recognition of this statement as a Non Sequitur. Thus, it highlights the importance of ensuring that conclusions are backed by substantial and pertinent evidence in discussions related to roles and effectiveness in management or executive positions.