Which technique is not applied when believing a group of religious leaders will make significant decisions on peace?

The choice indicating "No Technique" suggests that in the context of believing a group of religious leaders will make significant decisions on peace, no specific persuasive technique is being employed. This option highlights a scenario where the assumption that the group will effectively influence peace decisions is based on general belief rather than logical reasoning or specific persuasive strategies.

In contrast, the other options refer to specific logical fallacies or persuasive techniques, like Composition and Division, which involve reasoning from the parts to the whole or vice versa, and Faulty Analogy, which compares two unrelated things in a way that misleads. Since the question implies a lack of specific persuasive strategies at play, "No Technique" correctly highlights that the belief in the decision-making power of the group of religious leaders is not founded on these structured methods of reasoning.