Which logical fallacy occurs when a car's stalling is attributed to all students being decenter than their parents?

The scenario described illustrates a hasty generalization, which occurs when a conclusion is drawn from an insufficient amount of evidence or an overly broad sample. In this case, attributing a car's stalling to the notion that all students are "decenter" (which could imply less competent or capable in some manner) than their parents represents a sweeping generalization based on a limited or faulty premise.

In this argument, the car's stalling is not logically connected to the behavior or abilities of students as a whole. Instead, it reflects a conclusion reached without adequate support, as there may be numerous other factors that could cause a car to stall, unrelated to the characteristics of students compared to their parents.

By mistakenly linking these two unrelated ideas, the argument fails to establish a logical connection between them, reinforcing the presence of a hasty generalization in the reasoning process.