Which logical fallacy might be exploited in a political argument to sway public opinion?

A hasty generalization occurs when a conclusion is drawn based on insufficient or biased evidence. In political arguments, this fallacy is often exploited to sway public opinion by making broad claims about a group or situation without adequate support. For example, a politician might highlight a few instances of crime in a certain demographic and then generalize that the entire group is criminally inclined. This type of reasoning can evoke fear or anger in the public, leading them to adopt a particular viewpoint or policy without critically examining the broader context or the validity of the evidence presented.

In political discourse, such oversimplifications can be particularly influential because they exploit our tendency to recognize patterns and make judgments based on limited information, thus effectively shaping perceptions and opinions in a way that may not reflect reality.