Which argument presents a logical fallacy when arguing that no one can believe in God because past individuals who believed in God acted immorally?

The argument that no one can believe in God because past individuals who believed in God acted immorally represents a non sequitur fallacy. This type of fallacy occurs when the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises presented. In this case, the immoral actions of some individuals do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that belief in God is inherently false or unreasonable.

The argument mistakenly connects the actions of certain believers to the validity of belief itself. Just because some individuals who professed a belief in God acted immorally does not logically lead to the conclusion that everyone who believes in God will or must act immorally. Each individual’s belief and moral actions should be evaluated independently of the historical actions of others. This disconnect in reasoning illustrates a classic case of non sequitur, wherein the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.