When experiencing a personal setback, which logical error is made by concluding all related experiences will be negative?

The scenario described involves making a broad conclusion based on a limited experience, which is the essence of a hasty generalization. This type of logical error occurs when someone reflects on a specific, negative event or setback and then mistakenly assumes that future experiences in similar contexts will inevitably yield the same negative outcomes. This reasoning overlooks the possibility that not all experiences are the same and can lead to a skewed perception of reality.

For example, if someone fails a test, they might conclude that they will always fail future tests, disregarding factors such as improved study techniques or the possibility of different exam conditions. This generalization is hasty because it draws a conclusion about all related situations based solely on one instance, rather than considering a broader range of evidence or experiences.

Understanding this error is crucial, as it helps individuals recognize their tendency to overgeneralize from negative experiences, which can hinder their motivation and lead to an overly pessimistic outlook on future events. By identifying this pattern, one can begin to adjust their thinking and approach to setbacks more constructively.