When a person states that their choice of number is lucky and should influence their betting strategy, what fallacy is represented?

The situation described illustrates the non sequitur fallacy, which occurs when a conclusion does not logically follow from the premises or evidence presented. In this case, the individual believes that their choice of lucky number should influence their betting strategy, implying that the characteristic of being "lucky" possesses a direct impact on the outcomes of betting. However, the randomness of betting outcomes does not logically connect to the idea of luck. Consequently, the reasoning lacks a valid link, exemplifying the non sequitur fallacy where the conclusion drawn (using a lucky number) does not logically follow from the belief stated (that the number is lucky). This fallacy highlights a disconnect between belief and logical reasoning, illustrating how personal beliefs do not necessarily translate to factual influences in situations governed by chance.