What type of reasoning flaw is illustrated by the statement regarding expensive dining at the Ritz Restaurant?

The statement regarding expensive dining at the Ritz Restaurant exemplifies a Non Sequitur reasoning flaw because it presents a conclusion that does not logically follow from the premises provided. In this case, if the argument implies that simply because a restaurant is expensive, it must be good or have superior food quality, the connection between high prices and quality is not necessarily valid. Such reasoning fails to establish a direct relationship between the premises (the cost of dining) and the conclusion (the quality of the dining experience). A Non Sequitur occurs when the argument's conclusion doesn't logically derive from its premises, leading to a potentially misleading or unsupported assertion about the situation at hand.