What type of reasoning error can be identified when concluding that one bad experience at a university justifies not attending at all?

The reasoning error identified in concluding that one bad experience at a university justifies not attending at all is known as hasty generalization. This type of reasoning occurs when someone makes a broad conclusion based on insufficient evidence or a limited sample size. In this case, the individual is taking one negative experience as representative of the entire university experience, which is an unwarranted leap in logic. Such conclusions disregard the numerous positive experiences or the complexity of the situation, leading to an unfair generalization about the institution as a whole.

Other options, though they represent different types of reasoning flaws, do not appropriately capture the essence of the error made in this scenario. Hasty generalization is specifically about drawing conclusions from too few instances, highlighting the lack of comprehensive assessment based on more varied evidence.