What type of reasoning error occurs when declaring that a group is not good based solely on a few individuals?

The reasoning error described is known as Hasty Generalization. This fallacy occurs when a conclusion about a whole group is drawn from an insufficient or unrepresentative sample of that group. In this case, evaluating the entire group's character or worth based solely on the actions or characteristics of just a few individuals leads to an unjustified and sweeping conclusion.

Hasty Generalization often arises in discussions where anecdotal evidence is used as a basis for making broad statements. For example, if one were to observe a few negative behaviors from a small subset of a community and then claim that all members of that community share those negative traits, they would be committing a Hasty Generalization. This reasoning fails to consider the diversity within the group and can perpetuate stereotypes or misconceptions.

Other options such as Division, Selected Instances, and Faulty Analogy involve different forms of reasoning errors that do not specifically pertain to generalizing from a few individuals to an entire group. Division addresses incorrect inferences made about parts from knowledge of the whole; Selected Instances involves presenting evidence that supports a premise while ignoring contrary evidence; and Faulty Analogy refers to drawing unsupported conclusions based on superficial similarities between two scenarios. Each of these represents a distinct logical fallacy, underscoring the