What reasoning flaw is indicated by using a specific example from history to judge a whole institution?

Using a specific example from history to judge an entire institution highlights the reasoning flaw of selected instances. This flaw occurs when an argument is based on a limited set of examples or instances, ignoring the broader context or the multitude of other instances that may offer contradictory information. By focusing on one particular example, the argument may lead to misleading conclusions not representative of the overall situation.

In this context, utilizing a single historical event to make judgments about an entire institution overlooks other evidence that may present a more balanced view. This lack of a comprehensive perspective can skew one's understanding and lead to an unfair characterization of that institution, making the argument fundamentally flawed. Consequently, the reasoning effectively undermines the complexity of historical institutions by relying on selective evidence rather than a holistic analysis.