What logical flaw occurs when one assumes that all good architectural features can be combined without conflict?

The assumption that all good architectural features can be combined without conflict demonstrates the logical flaw known as composition. This fallacy occurs when it is mistakenly believed that what is true for individual parts is also true for the whole. In the context of architecture, just because certain features might work well individually does not guarantee that their integration into a single design will yield a harmonious or functional outcome.

For example, one might assume that combining an open floor plan, large windows, and a traditional roof style will automatically result in an effective structure. However, these elements could conflict in practice due to practical considerations such as structural integrity, aesthetic coherence, and the building’s intended purpose. Therefore, this flaw underscores the importance of assessing how various features interact as a whole rather than simply aggregating them based on their individual merits.