What kind of reasoning is used in concluding that the equality laws mean sex discrimination is resolved?

The conclusion that the equality laws mean sex discrimination is resolved can be attributed to hasty generalization. This type of reasoning occurs when a conclusion is drawn based on insufficient or selective evidence. In the context of sex discrimination and equality laws, assuming that the enactment of these laws automatically resolves all issues of discrimination overlooks the complexity and persistence of such issues in society.

While equality laws represent important progress, they do not guarantee the eradication of discrimination in practice. Hasty generalization can lead to an oversimplified view that misses out on the nuanced realities of how laws interact with social norms, workplace environments, and individual experiences. The reasoning commits the error of broadly applying the success of legal reforms to the broader context of societal attitudes and behavior surrounding discrimination.