What is a common argument against the dangers of crack cocaine?

The argument about crack cocaine's dangers being that it is cheap and extremely dangerous underscores the substance's widespread availability and the profound risks associated with its use. Crack cocaine is often more accessible than other forms of cocaine, which can lead to higher rates of addiction and associated health issues among users. The low cost makes it attractive, especially to vulnerable populations, increasing the risk of misuse and its consequent health impacts, such as addiction, mental health problems, and physical health deterioration.

This perspective is central to discussions about drug policy and public health, emphasizing the need for interventions and support for those affected. While other options may touch on aspects related to crack cocaine, they do not encapsulate the gravity of its widespread danger in the same way that this choice does. For instance, the idea of long-term rehabilitation, while relevant, is more about the response to addiction rather than an argument against its dangers. Similarly, suggesting that it is harmful only to certain age groups could undermine the understanding of its pervasive effects across all demographics. Hence, the emphasis on its cheapness and dangers captures a critical and direct argument regarding the issue.