What flawed reasoning is demonstrated by the poll about the School Board tax?

The reasoning demonstrated by the poll about the School Board tax illustrates making a generalization from limited evidence. In this context, when a poll draws broad conclusions about public opinion or support for the tax based on a small or unrepresentative sample, it fails to accurately reflect the views of the entire community. Generalizing from limited evidence can lead to skewed or misleading interpretations, suggesting that the tax is either more or less popular than it truly is.

In contrast, employing biased questioning would involve phrasing questions in such a way that they lead respondents toward a particular answer, which is not the case here. Using a representative sample would ensure that the results reflect the general population’s views accurately, thus avoiding the issue of limited evidence. Exaggerating the opposition's view involves presenting an unrealistic portrayal of what opponents of the tax believe, which also does not directly relate to drawing generalizations from insufficient data.