What flaw is suggested when a person claims their opponent has not raised taxes despite evidence to the contrary?

The choice indicating that a flaw is suggested when a person claims their opponent has not raised taxes, despite evidence to the contrary, pertains to the logical fallacy of selected instances. This fallacy occurs when an individual selectively presents information that supports their argument while ignoring relevant evidence that contradicts it.

In this context, the claim about not raising taxes dismisses or overlooks existing evidence that shows tax changes, suggesting a deliberate choice to focus only on specific information that benefits their position. This selective use of information can create a misleading impression of the situation, as it does not consider the complete picture and may misinform the audience.

Failing to acknowledge opposing evidence while maintaining a singular narrative strengthens this fallacy, pointing to a bias in argumentation and a lack of comprehensive analysis of the topic at hand.