What fallacy is illustrated in the statement, "The Democratic party is corrupt. Pam Smith appears to be an attractive candidate. However, she's a Democrat. So I'm not voting for her."?

The fallacy illustrated in the statement involves the reasoning that because one entity (the Democratic party) is considered corrupt, any candidate associated with that entity (Pam Smith, a Democrat) must also be corrupt and therefore unworthy of support. This is a classic case of the fallacy of division, where it is assumed that what is true for a whole (the Democratic party) must also be true for its parts (individual candidates). In this scenario, the assumption overlooks the possibility that Pam Smith may not share the corrupt characteristics of the party as a whole, thus making the conclusion unwarranted based purely on her party affiliation. This reasoning is critically flawed because it dismisses the individual merits of the candidate without evidence to justify the blanket judgment based on party ideology.