What fallacy is displayed when concluding that Lithuania's next leader will be elected based on his charismatic traits?

The conclusion that Lithuania's next leader will be elected solely based on his charismatic traits represents a non sequitur fallacy. This fallacy occurs when the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. In this case, while charisma may be an important trait for a leader, concluding that it guarantees election overlooks other critical factors influencing electoral outcomes, such as political policies, public opinion, and the broader electoral context. The argument fails to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between charisma and election results, making the conclusion unsupported by valid reasoning. This highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of what contributes to a successful political campaign, beyond just a leader's personal attributes.