What fallacy is conveyed when one assumes that successful individuals in one field will also succeed in completely different fields?

The fallacy of assuming that successful individuals in one field will also succeed in completely different fields is best identified as a faulty analogy. This fallacy occurs when a comparison is drawn between two things that are not sufficiently similar to justify the conclusion that one can expect the same outcome in both scenarios.

In this case, suggesting that someone who excels in one area (for example, a business executive) will automatically thrive in a vastly different discipline (such as the arts) overlooks the unique skills, knowledge, and experiences required for each field. It assumes that the traits leading to success in one field directly translate to another without acknowledging the important contextual differences that exist.

This type of fallacy can lead to misguided expectations and conclusions, as it fails to recognize that success might depend on a variety of factors specific to each individual field that may not be interchangeable.