What does the previous employment of the defendant indicate, according to the lawyer's reasoning?

The previous employment of the defendant is interpreted as an indicator that leads to a decision of guilt because it may imply a pattern of behavior, character attributes, or potential motives relevant to the case. In legal arguments, a defendant's work history can provide insight into their reliability, stability, or propensity for certain actions. If the lawyer connects the employment history with the circumstances of the case, it can be framed to suggest that their previous positions or experiences contribute to the credibility of the accusations against them. This connection is often leveraged to persuade the jury of the defendant's guilt, suggesting that their past may be indicative of their current actions or choices. Through this lens, the employment history plays a critical role in shaping the perception of the defendant in the eyes of the court.