The claim that increased crime rates warrant the removal of churches depicts which logical fallacy?

The claim that increased crime rates warrant the removal of churches illustrates a non sequitur logical fallacy because it presents a conclusion that does not logically follow from the premise. In this case, the argument suggests a direct relationship between crime rates and the presence of churches, implying that their removal would address the issue of crime. However, the reasoning lacks a clear connection; just because crime rates have risen does not logically lead to the conclusion that churches are responsible for this increase or that removing them would solve the problem.

A non sequitur disrupts logical coherence in an argument, making the claim appear unfounded or bizarrely illogical. In this instance, the assertion misses establishing why churches should be linked to crime rates, hence failing to provide a rational basis for the suggested action. This disconnect exemplifies the essence of a non sequitur, where the conclusion does not arise from the premises presented.