The argument that the teacher thinks the class is doing excellent work, hence I should get a good grade, exemplifies which logical fallacy?

The argument presented is an example of a non sequitur. This logical fallacy occurs when a conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. In this case, the reasoning is that because the teacher believes the entire class is performing well, it must also mean that an individual student should receive a good grade. This line of reasoning ignores other potential factors that could affect an individual's grade and does not provide a valid connection between the premise (the teacher's opinion of class performance) and the conclusion (the student's grade). Therefore, the conclusion is not logically supported by the given premise, which is characteristic of a non sequitur.

In contrast, the other logical fallacies listed involve different types of reasoning errors. A hasty generalization involves making a general claim based on insufficient evidence. Division suggests that what is true for a whole must be true for its parts, which is not applicable here. A faulty analogy draws a comparison between two unlike things in a way that is misleading, which is also not the structure of this argument. Understanding these distinctions helps clarify why the argument is best categorized as a non sequitur.