In the conversation about voodoo priests, what reasoning error does Tourist B make?

Tourist B's reasoning error is categorized as "No Technique." This indicates that the individual failed to utilize any formal logical reasoning or analytical approach to support their viewpoint about voodoo priests. In the context of the conversation, this could suggest that Tourist B is emphasizing personal opinions or anecdotal experiences rather than relying on established facts, evidence, or structured arguments.

When examining discussions surrounding cultural practices such as voodoo, it is critical to support claims with pertinent historical, social, or psychological insights. By neglecting to apply any kind of rigorous thinking or methodology—essentially not employing any reasoning technique—Tourist B leaves their argument unsubstantiated and open to criticism. This lack of analytical depth may result in misunderstandings or oversimplifications of a complex cultural phenomenon, leading to inaccurate or misguided viewpoints about voodoo and its practitioners.