In the argument stating "All blondes are dumb" based on personal experiences with three individuals, what type of reasoning error is being committed?

The argument "All blondes are dumb" based on personal experiences with just three individuals exemplifies a hasty generalization. This type of reasoning error occurs when a broad conclusion is drawn from a limited and specific set of examples. In this case, the individual’s experiences with only three blondes are insufficient to justify a universal statement about all blondes. Statistics and logical reasoning require a significantly larger and more representative sample to make accurate and fair generalizations about any group. By relying on such a small number of cases, the argument unjustly extrapolates personal experiences to an entire population, leading to an erroneous conclusion. This highlights the need for caution in drawing large-scale conclusions from inadequate evidence.