In making the argument that the church is against humanitarianism based solely on historical events, which fallacy is being applied?

The argument that the church is against humanitarianism based solely on historical events exemplifies the Selected Instances fallacy. This fallacy occurs when one draws a conclusion based on a limited number of examples or instances, leading to an inaccurate or overly simplistic generalization.

In this context, focusing on specific historical events may overlook a broader range of actions and beliefs held by the church that could support or contradict the argument. By cherry-picking particular instances where the church may have acted against humanitarian principles, the argument disregards the complexity of the church's overall relationship with humanitarianism. A thorough examination would require considering all relevant evidence and not just selected occurrences, which might not accurately represent the church's stance on humanitarian issues as a whole.

This approach avoids engaging with potential counterexamples or the multifaceted history of the church, emphasizing the limitation of drawing conclusions from selected historical instances.