An argument based on a few specific instances while ignoring overall evidence falls under which category?

The concept of an argument based on a few specific instances while ignoring overall evidence is best categorized as a Hasty Generalization. This type of argument occurs when a conclusion is drawn from insufficient or non-representative evidence. In making a hasty generalization, the individual takes a small sample of cases and assumes that they represent the entire population, leading to a potentially misleading or incorrect conclusion.

While selected instances may touch on the use of specific examples, the crux of the issue with hasty generalization is the flawed logic that arises from over-relying on a limited number of examples without taking into account the broader context or more comprehensive data. Understanding this distinction is crucial for critically analyzing arguments and ensuring they are supported by sufficient evidence.